Corporal Punishment Is Physical Abuse :: essays research papers fc

bodily Punishment Is Physical AbuseCorporal penalization is the execution of a judicially imposed sentencethat inflicts a manner of physical pain upon the offenders body without killinghim. In the past embodied punishment included flogging, whipping, branding andfacial or bodily mutilation of all types. Corporal punishment also refers to thediscipline of children at home and in schools alone it was do illegal forpunishing schoolchildren in 1986.Historically, corporal punishment was used in the ancient law codes ofHammurabi and Moses, in laws of Sparta and other Greek city states, in too soonChristian church teachings and in Anglo-Saxon common laws. It is still used inmany parts of the world and remains in the criminal codes of some(prenominal) Europeancommunities. In the twentieth century, corporal punishment has received severecriticism. Many people believe it is a barbaric relic of a at peace(p) age,completely opposite with present day humanitarian ethics.With a rising cri me rate many are favouring the reinstitution ofphysical punishment for very satanic crimes. It has been shown that many adultsin England want the restoration of corporal punishment for certain crimes,hoping that it will effect the reaction against an ever increasing amount ofcrime.The use of corporal punishment on children has also dropped sharply. Inmany school systems of the United States, for example, corporal punishment hasbeen outlawed, it is also illegal in countries such as Sweden, Finland, Denmarkand Norway.Corporal punishment for certain offences is very effective, because itsdone quickly and feared by all. Not only will it teach the offender not torepeat his violent actions but it will also discourage him. It teaches theschool boy or convict that doing wrong will be followed by pain and suffering.When used justly and without crossness the giver is not brutalised. In manyindependent schools where it still occurs it is thought of as a final punishment.It accustoms the pupi ls to the hardships of real life and no bitterness is left fieldafter it has been used for good reasons. It is always impossible to make thepunishment fit the crime, with corporal punishment the amount can be adjusted to conform to the offender. It is much better than other punishments which are deadeningto the mind and the body. Schools which dont find corporal punishment essential,especially for young children, substitute it with other methods which are resembling to terrorising. Detentions are also harmful because they increase thenu mber of hours a boy is forced to spend indoors in physical inactivity. Hisrestlessness is increased by the compel restraint which leads to further